Here’s why the phone company is so rich and powerful

Monday, May 12, 2008

It's no secret that I am really pissed off about fees -- from ATMs to telephone bills, we are charged enormous amounts of money just cents at a time; far more than is proper in most cases, just because they can. Why do we continue to pay without protest?
Here's an interesting point from a UK scientist, who expounds on the high price of SMS messages:
A University of Leicester space scientist has worked out that sending texts via mobile phones works out to be far more expensive than downloading data from the Hubble Space Telescope.

He worked out the cost of obtaining a megabyte of data from Hubble – and compared that with the 5p cost of sending a text.

He said: “The bottom line is texting is at least 4 times more expensive than transmitting data from Hubble, and is likely to be substantially more than that.

“The maximum size for a text message is 160 characters, which takes 140 bytes because there are only 7 bits per character in the text messaging system, and we assume the average price for a text message is 5p. There are 1,048,576 bytes in a megabyte, so that's 1 million/140 = 7490 text messages to transmit one megabyte. At 5p each, that's £374.49 per MB - or about 4.4 times more expensive than the ‘most pessimistic’ estimate for Hubble Space Telescope transmission costs.”

Dr Bannister said it had been difficult to work out exactly how much Hubble data transmission costs. So he contacted NASA who gave him a firm figure of £8.85 [$17.35] per megabyte (MB) for the transmission of data from HST to the Earth.

“This doesn't include the cost of the ground stations and the time of the personnel along the way, but it is an unambiguous number for that part of the process. So that's £8.85 to get each MB from Hubble, to the first point of contact on the ground, but no further. Hence we need to go a little bit further to estimate exactly how much it costs to transmit data from Hubble to the end user - i.e. to the data archive which scientists can access. This is difficult, so I had to make some conservative assumptions.”

Dr Bannister estimated the cost of the data from Hubble could vary between £8.85 and £85 per MB- much cheaper than the £374.49 per MB cost of transmitting one MB of text.

In case you're wondering, that 5p cost works out to 10¢ in US currency -- and US phone operators are now charging between 15¢ and 20¢ per text message. That comes out to a whopping $1123.50 per megabyte of data. That's $1,106 more expensive than Hubble data.
I'm convinced that most people pay these outrageous fees because, like ATMs, they think that it is expensive to have instant data communication. If they realized that it is cheaper for the company to send tiny snippets of data rather than voice; if they understood that ATMs are infinitely cheaper than branch offices and salaries of tellers; if they understood that half of the fees listed on various bills as "Federal" are not taxes nor mandated by the government... well, perhaps there would be a mass uprising. Until then, the sheep will continue to be fleeced and companies will continue to rape us of every last nickel.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Archives

- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002

My Stats

This site has been viewed 83368 times since Jan. 1, 2012
it was viewed 1,030,925 times in 2005
it was viewed 1,424,132 times in 2006
it was viewed 1,396,693 times in 2007
it was viewed 1,661,669 times in 2008
it was viewed 1,973,879 times in 2009
and it was viewed 3,790,851 times in 2010-2011 (oops - forgot to restart the counter.
There are 5867 total entries. That number makes me think I've been wasting my life.

The Best of Times

Texas Artists Perform the Songs of Sara Hickman

Learn more...

Who do I think I am?

I’m a graphic designer, creative director, web designer, and sometimes filmmaking lackey. Bred in Arlington, Virginia I’ve now inexplicably ended up in San Jose, California which is just close enough to Disneyland to make it an expensive hobby.

©1995-2012 Gene Cowan. Most rights reserved, more or less.