February 07, 2010
09:36 am
Brain like a used tea bag
Reading about Sarah Palin's rant against Obama this morning in the Washington Post, I came across a particularly stupid web comment (in a page filled with stupid comments):
This is typical of right-wing crazies: they ignore facts left and right and begin to truly believe the nonsense they spew. I guess this commenter forgot a few things, like the fact that he was a senator. Just for the record, let's take a look at President Obama's resume, shall we?
Now let's take a look at Mrs. Palin's credentials:
Now answer the question: Who would you vote for?
Reading about Sarah Palin's rant against Obama this morning in the Washington Post, I came across a particularly stupid web comment (in a page filled with stupid comments):
Just for a minute, forget political party, forget names, race and gender. Answer this question:
Who would you vote for to run this country?
1 - community organizer.
or
2 - former mayor, energy commissioner and
governor.
NUFF SAID!
This is typical of right-wing crazies: they ignore facts left and right and begin to truly believe the nonsense they spew. I guess this commenter forgot a few things, like the fact that he was a senator. Just for the record, let's take a look at President Obama's resume, shall we?
- Graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School
- President of the Harvard Law School
- Community Organizer
- Civil Rights Attorney
- Constitutional Law Professor at University of Chicago Law School
- Three term Illinois State Senator
- U.S. Senate
- Nobel Peace Prize laureate (hey, we all pad our resume with awards we didn't necessarily feel worthy of.)
Now let's take a look at Mrs. Palin's credentials:
- Hawaii Pacific University (Fall 1982), North Idaho College (spring & fall 1983), University of Idaho (fall 1984, spring 1985), Matanuska-Susitna College (fall 1985), University of Idaho (spring 1986). Bachelors in communications, 1987.
- Miss Wasilla, 1984; third place Miss Alaska
- Sportscaster
- City Council, Wasilla, AK
- Mayor, Wasilla, AK
- Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (2003, resigned 2004)
- Governor, Alaska (2006, resigned 2009)
Now answer the question: Who would you vote for?
posted by Gene Cowan | category Right = Wrong
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
February 06, 2010
08:46 am
That about covers it
This succinct headline from The Washington Post, during this weekend's blizzard, pretty much sums up all the news these days, doesn't it?
This succinct headline from The Washington Post, during this weekend's blizzard, pretty much sums up all the news these days, doesn't it?
February 02, 2010
08:45 am
This has got to be a parody. Right?
The article on "Windows7News.com" — which sounds like a TV station website — is headlined "Why the iPad will fail and help Windows 7 to succeed."
The first thing under that headline is this:
Tip: Click here to run a free scan for common PC errors
'Nuff said?
The article on "Windows7News.com" — which sounds like a TV station website — is headlined "Why the iPad will fail and help Windows 7 to succeed."
The first thing under that headline is this:
Tip: Click here to run a free scan for common PC errors
'Nuff said?
posted by Gene Cowan | category General Annoyances
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
February 01, 2010
03:09 pm
Battle of the Network Connections
About 4 months ago, I switched to Comcast Business, upgrading my residential connection so that I could host my server at home instead of in a datacenter.
So far, I have no complaints with Comcast Business. No, the problems I have are — still — with Comcast Residential.
You see, in those 4 months I've had 3 outages. One was area-wide. The other two are the outrage: they were deliberate.
Comcast Residential did it. They came to my house and physically disconnected the cable which was providing business service. The've done this THREE TIMES, although one of those times they were thwarted when I came home early.
They did it again today. My server has been disconnected all day because of a lack of communication between business units at Comcast.
Here's a good question: if Comcast Residential came by and disconnected me months ago — when they weren't supposed to — didn't they make a note of that? Why do they keep coming back to do it over and over?
More importantly, why am I paying big bucks for a business-class connection that the residential people still have access to disconnect? Ever heard of a tag? A lable? Something on the pole to indicate that this is NOT to be disconnected?
I'm so pissed off at Comcast right now that I'm actually BEYOND a long screed here. I'll be saving that for their executives and customer service.
And I'll have to wait to post this 'cos I have NO INTERNET CONNECTION.
About 4 months ago, I switched to Comcast Business, upgrading my residential connection so that I could host my server at home instead of in a datacenter.
So far, I have no complaints with Comcast Business. No, the problems I have are — still — with Comcast Residential.
You see, in those 4 months I've had 3 outages. One was area-wide. The other two are the outrage: they were deliberate.
Comcast Residential did it. They came to my house and physically disconnected the cable which was providing business service. The've done this THREE TIMES, although one of those times they were thwarted when I came home early.
They did it again today. My server has been disconnected all day because of a lack of communication between business units at Comcast.
Here's a good question: if Comcast Residential came by and disconnected me months ago — when they weren't supposed to — didn't they make a note of that? Why do they keep coming back to do it over and over?
More importantly, why am I paying big bucks for a business-class connection that the residential people still have access to disconnect? Ever heard of a tag? A lable? Something on the pole to indicate that this is NOT to be disconnected?
I'm so pissed off at Comcast right now that I'm actually BEYOND a long screed here. I'll be saving that for their executives and customer service.
And I'll have to wait to post this 'cos I have NO INTERNET CONNECTION.
posted by Gene Cowan | category The War with the Customer
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
09:37 am
Monday Math
I'm not good at mathematics, that's clear. But I am good at discerning patterns, and here's what I've found about my commute to work: the later I leave, the longer it takes. It's the same 5-1/2 miles each way, but as the morning wears on there are not only more cars, but more "working" vehicles — pickups, panel vans, dump trucks. This morning my commute took a whopping 35 minutes. That's the result of excessively red traffic lights and vans marked "Speedy Plumbing" going 15 miles an hour.
I may not know math, but I can tell you this: my commute is logarithmic.
I'm not good at mathematics, that's clear. But I am good at discerning patterns, and here's what I've found about my commute to work: the later I leave, the longer it takes. It's the same 5-1/2 miles each way, but as the morning wears on there are not only more cars, but more "working" vehicles — pickups, panel vans, dump trucks. This morning my commute took a whopping 35 minutes. That's the result of excessively red traffic lights and vans marked "Speedy Plumbing" going 15 miles an hour.
I may not know math, but I can tell you this: my commute is logarithmic.
posted by Gene Cowan | category General Annoyances
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
January 27, 2010
03:16 pm
Physically, but not emotionally
Wanna see an example of how bad ageism is in the gay world?
I am older than both the "mature" guys in this ad. (But as I look younger, I assume they're lying about their age.)
Wanna see an example of how bad ageism is in the gay world?
I am older than both the "mature" guys in this ad. (But as I look younger, I assume they're lying about their age.)
posted by Gene Cowan | category Life... Don't talk to me about life.
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
01:30 pm
What’s another $30 between friends?
I think I get the gist of the AT&T "special deal" with Apple for the iPad: Apple uses a microSIM card in the pad, which means that people who are already paying a minimum of $70 a month for iPhone service — like me — can't just pull out the regular-sized iPhone SIM and put it in their iPad. They have to have a completely different data plan for the new device.
Sneaky.
I think I get the gist of the AT&T "special deal" with Apple for the iPad: Apple uses a microSIM card in the pad, which means that people who are already paying a minimum of $70 a month for iPhone service — like me — can't just pull out the regular-sized iPhone SIM and put it in their iPad. They have to have a completely different data plan for the new device.
Sneaky.
posted by Gene Cowan | category The War with the Customer
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
12:37 pm
Let the peanut gallery throw stones
Let's take a look at what blog commenters are saying about Apple's newly announced iPad in the first hour or so, shall we?
So, the device is such a big fail that he's willing to spend $499 on it. If only everyone felt as strongly about it's failings, Apple would make even MORE money. Gosh, why not buy a Nexus One for only a dollar more? Moron.
Seriously? You think that mobile Safari is doomed to a fatal death spiral 'cos it doesn't have Flash? Funny how that didn't stop 75 million people from buying the phone. Now with the iPad, I'm thinking that the fatality we're looking toward is the crashy, bloaty, resource-hoggy Flash itself.
"A real setback for this device." Yeah, I'm betting that no one will ever buy one.
Get real. "Multitasking" is such a ridiculous term. The iPhone is "multitasking" all the time. The problem is you're equating it with a regular computer. You know, one that's plugged in and charging all the time. Can it receive email while you're surfing? Yes. Can it get a phone call while you're playing Scrabble? Yup. Can it take a picture while you're using Twitterific? Sure. Can it play streaming music through a web browser when you're using the Maps app? No. And frankly, I don't want my web browser to be doing ANYTHING when I'm not in it, considering what an easy vector that is for all kinds of crud. Want to play music while you're doing something else? Um, it's an iPod. Every heard of it? Put your music on it and play while you're doing other things. MULTITASK.
Meanwhile, the biggest reason these devices don't really need multitasking: speed. Going from one app to launching another takes as little time as going from one window to another on my laptop. It might as well be multitasking.
Who said it was a netbook killer except other dunderheaded pundits? Meanwhile, have you ever met someone who loves their "netbook" more than their iPhone?
You enjoy interacting with slow, buggy flash on a tiny Nokia screen then, and leave the rest of us to our open standards.
You know, I've had a webcam for as long as I can remember. And I think I've had a video chat maybe 4 or 5 times in the last 10 years. Seriously. There's a reason that the Bell System PicturePhone didn't ever arrive in our living rooms. Get over it. Just because we can do a thing doesn't mean we must do a thing. (And seriously, I don't want to try to have a video chat with someone who's holding the camera in their hands and bouncing back and forth, much less deal with the bandwidth of transmitting a constantly moving, changing picture.)
I love how people don't pay attention to what's come before — whether in tech or history — and jam their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU and then assume they're somehow prescient for pointing out what many others have... long after they've been proven wrong.
Ugh. I can't read any more.
Seriously: if you haul rocks for a living, don't go on some websites and complain that the Mini Cooper won't haul boulders like an F-150 will. Really.
Let's take a look at what blog commenters are saying about Apple's newly announced iPad in the first hour or so, shall we?
Unknown if it supports flash, and no multitasking that we've seen = fail.
I'll get the 499 version to tinker with, just as soon as its jailbroken.
So, the device is such a big fail that he's willing to spend $499 on it. If only everyone felt as strongly about it's failings, Apple would make even MORE money. Gosh, why not buy a Nexus One for only a dollar more? Moron.
not having Flash makes the big, empty video boxes in the middle of a page is pretty disappointing. Put differently, the fatal flaw of Apple's mobile browser has never been more apparent.
Seriously? You think that mobile Safari is doomed to a fatal death spiral 'cos it doesn't have Flash? Funny how that didn't stop 75 million people from buying the phone. Now with the iPad, I'm thinking that the fatality we're looking toward is the crashy, bloaty, resource-hoggy Flash itself.
There's no multitasking at all. It's a real disappointment. All this power and very little you can do with it at once. No multitasking means no streaming Pandora when you're working in Pages... you can figure it out. It's a real setback for this device.
"A real setback for this device." Yeah, I'm betting that no one will ever buy one.
Get real. "Multitasking" is such a ridiculous term. The iPhone is "multitasking" all the time. The problem is you're equating it with a regular computer. You know, one that's plugged in and charging all the time. Can it receive email while you're surfing? Yes. Can it get a phone call while you're playing Scrabble? Yup. Can it take a picture while you're using Twitterific? Sure. Can it play streaming music through a web browser when you're using the Maps app? No. And frankly, I don't want my web browser to be doing ANYTHING when I'm not in it, considering what an easy vector that is for all kinds of crud. Want to play music while you're doing something else? Um, it's an iPod. Every heard of it? Put your music on it and play while you're doing other things. MULTITASK.
Meanwhile, the biggest reason these devices don't really need multitasking: speed. Going from one app to launching another takes as little time as going from one window to another on my laptop. It might as well be multitasking.
no flash, no multitasking, no integrated webcam, no integrated physical keyboard
netbook killer?? seriously?
Who said it was a netbook killer except other dunderheaded pundits? Meanwhile, have you ever met someone who loves their "netbook" more than their iPhone?
no flash 10.1? heck it doesnt even have flash at all, even my nokia 5800 has flash lite
You enjoy interacting with slow, buggy flash on a tiny Nokia screen then, and leave the rest of us to our open standards.
would it have been insane to have added a camera, sd card slot, Gpu, flash support in the browser?!?!?!? I would gladly pay a extra 50 bucks for all that. (and ya it probably would cost less)
We have a winner...
The "best" crap gadget ever!
Thanks Steve. You did it... The Newton 2... FAIL !
Oh, and can anyone tell me who would ever need this thing? If you have an iphone, you have almost all of the functionality (okay, fine, youo dont have iWork on the iphone... but who is going to use this thing for work?, and even if you did, you seriously would buy this just to use iWork????
Really???
Even my Asus netbook has a built-in webcam. And Flash. And multitasking. What everyone is saying is right. The iPad isn't a proper computer at all. Hell, it's not even iPhone-caliber. It's a giant novelty iPod Touch.
You know, I've had a webcam for as long as I can remember. And I think I've had a video chat maybe 4 or 5 times in the last 10 years. Seriously. There's a reason that the Bell System PicturePhone didn't ever arrive in our living rooms. Get over it. Just because we can do a thing doesn't mean we must do a thing. (And seriously, I don't want to try to have a video chat with someone who's holding the camera in their hands and bouncing back and forth, much less deal with the bandwidth of transmitting a constantly moving, changing picture.)
I love how people don't pay attention to what's come before — whether in tech or history — and jam their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU and then assume they're somehow prescient for pointing out what many others have... long after they've been proven wrong.
Ugh. I can't read any more.
Seriously: if you haul rocks for a living, don't go on some websites and complain that the Mini Cooper won't haul boulders like an F-150 will. Really.
posted by Gene Cowan | category General Annoyances
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
January 26, 2010
05:42 pm
One of the World’s Most Blurred Women
Thanks to a bizarre face-blurring algorithm that ABC is using on their HD news broadcast, Diane Sawyer looks like she's in an advertisement for Claritin.
Thanks to a bizarre face-blurring algorithm that ABC is using on their HD news broadcast, Diane Sawyer looks like she's in an advertisement for Claritin.
- If she instigated it: Diane Sawyer is 64 years old and looks damn good for her age. Perhaps she should check her vanity and be a model for gracefully aging women everywhere. Her wrinkles are a badge of honor and she has earned every one of them through her long career.
- If ABC instigated it: what's the point of going HD? Now we have a sharp picture except for faces — and that's where we look as we watch. Just go to widescreen SD and call it a day. 'Cos your experiment in trying to hide reality isn't working. It's just freaking people out.
posted by Gene Cowan | category The War with the Customer
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
03:39 pm
Idle Speculation
You know how when you open a stack in the Mac OS X dock, and you get this nice curvy fan of files?
Doesn't it look suspiciously like an interface that would work well on a device you hold in two hands and operate with your thumbs from the side?
You know how when you open a stack in the Mac OS X dock, and you get this nice curvy fan of files?
Doesn't it look suspiciously like an interface that would work well on a device you hold in two hands and operate with your thumbs from the side?
02:49 pm
Paradobe
Hey, Adobe — paranoid much?
Watch out — 'cos I could use Photoshop to create a document THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE SOMETHING ELSE!
Hey, Adobe — paranoid much?
Watch out — 'cos I could use Photoshop to create a document THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE SOMETHING ELSE!
posted by Gene Cowan | category The War with the Customer
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
January 25, 2010
03:04 pm
How to get a graphic designer drunk
When you see the swoosh, take a drink!
This is the result of a single Google search for "logo" on my lunch hour. I'm flabbergasted.
When you see the swoosh, take a drink!
This is the result of a single Google search for "logo" on my lunch hour. I'm flabbergasted.
posted by Gene Cowan | category The War with the Customer
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
10:46 am
Tales of Stupidity
On Thursday night, the warnings blared on my dashboard: Tire Pressure Too Low!
I swung into the gas station to check it out. Crouched in the dark, I checked the pressure, down to about 25psi. Feeding 4 quarters into the air machine got me something like 2 minutes of air, but it didn't seem to really make any difference. I slowly drove the remaining 3 blocks home. Since I was off to LA for the weekend, I figured I'd just obsess about it for the next 3 days and deal with it on Monday.
This morning. Once again, crouched by the side of my car using up all my quarters to inflate the tires. 10 minutes went by. Then 20 minutes. My hand was cramping from holding the air hose and my ankles were buckling. Every time I checked the pressure, no change. In fact, it seemed like the pressure was getting lower. There had to be a leak. This, I thought, is going to be a long, bad day dealing with car dealers and roadside maintenance and the like.
Hmm.
What is this lever on the air hose? I pressed it.
Oh. Air is now flowing into the tire...
For the last 20 minutes I have been holding the air hose to the tire, and bleeding the air out of the tire.
Duh.
On Thursday night, the warnings blared on my dashboard: Tire Pressure Too Low!
I swung into the gas station to check it out. Crouched in the dark, I checked the pressure, down to about 25psi. Feeding 4 quarters into the air machine got me something like 2 minutes of air, but it didn't seem to really make any difference. I slowly drove the remaining 3 blocks home. Since I was off to LA for the weekend, I figured I'd just obsess about it for the next 3 days and deal with it on Monday.
This morning. Once again, crouched by the side of my car using up all my quarters to inflate the tires. 10 minutes went by. Then 20 minutes. My hand was cramping from holding the air hose and my ankles were buckling. Every time I checked the pressure, no change. In fact, it seemed like the pressure was getting lower. There had to be a leak. This, I thought, is going to be a long, bad day dealing with car dealers and roadside maintenance and the like.
Hmm.
What is this lever on the air hose? I pressed it.
Oh. Air is now flowing into the tire...
For the last 20 minutes I have been holding the air hose to the tire, and bleeding the air out of the tire.
Duh.
posted by Gene Cowan | category Life... Don't talk to me about life.
comment on this entry (1 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (1 comments) | permalink | Share
January 21, 2010
03:50 pm
Scenes from a courtroom
A little excerpt from the Proposition 8 trial currently going on in California, featuring Prop 8 supporter William Tam:
A little excerpt from the Proposition 8 trial currently going on in California, featuring Prop 8 supporter William Tam:
Boies pointed to a position from Prop. 8 supporters that gays were 12 times more likely to molest children, a fact Tam said he believes.
Where'd you learn that? Boies asked. I don't recall, Tam replied.
"I'm asking you what you read?" Boies asked, voice rising, wanting to know how that could be put out to support Prop. 8.
"I don't remember," Tam said. "Was it a book?" Boies kept on. "An article?" he asked. "Who wrote it?"
"I don't know," Tam said.
Boies continued to press on messages from gay marriage opponents that Tam endorsed, including the fact that San Francisco government was "run by homosexuals." How could that be, the mayor isn't homosexual, is he? Boies asked. Tam agreed. Boies asked why he pushed Prop. 8 by saying same-sex marriage would result in legalizing prostitution.
"That didn't have anything to do with Proposition 8, did it sir?" Boies asked.
"Right," Tam said.
... asked whether he considers himself "hostile to gays and lesbians," Tam replied: "No, I don't."
posted by Gene Cowan | category Right = Wrong
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
January 09, 2010
08:30 am
Anatomy of an Earthquake
The 4.1 Milpitas earthquake that hit here on Thursday was a small affair — like all quakes, when it first starts you kind of freeze in place and wait to see what happens next. How big will it get? Is there a huge shock coming in a second? How long will it last? Thursday's was a reminder of earthquake reality but not all that exciting. Still, any earthquake is interesting to me and sets me off surfing the USGS website.
About 24 hours later, we had a second quake, a slightly smaller aftershock. It literally hit while I was on the USGS site, looking at aftershock information. I was amazed to see how many aftershocks there had been — and how many foreshocks there had been the days before.
As of this morning, here is a list of the earthquakes that have occurred in the same general spot:
The 4.1 Milpitas earthquake that hit here on Thursday was a small affair — like all quakes, when it first starts you kind of freeze in place and wait to see what happens next. How big will it get? Is there a huge shock coming in a second? How long will it last? Thursday's was a reminder of earthquake reality but not all that exciting. Still, any earthquake is interesting to me and sets me off surfing the USGS website.
About 24 hours later, we had a second quake, a slightly smaller aftershock. It literally hit while I was on the USGS site, looking at aftershock information. I was amazed to see how many aftershocks there had been — and how many foreshocks there had been the days before.
As of this morning, here is a list of the earthquakes that have occurred in the same general spot:
MAG DATE LOCAL-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION
y/m/d h:m:s deg deg km
2.5 2010/01/09 04:41:11 37.475N 121.793W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.0 2010/01/09 03:42:41 37.479N 121.803W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.3 2010/01/09 03:34:59 37.476N 121.792W 7.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.5 2010/01/09 03:24:41 37.476N 121.793W 7.8 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.3 2010/01/09 01:11:54 37.473N 121.802W 7.6 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.0 2010/01/08 23:10:44 37.476N 121.793W 8.6 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/08 19:30:54 37.477N 121.792W 7.1 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.2 2010/01/08 17:31:16 37.481N 121.798W 7.3 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/08 16:36:09 37.474N 121.794W 8.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/08 15:36:41 37.483N 121.791W 7.5 11 km ( 7 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.3 2010/01/08 15:17:06 37.482N 121.798W 7.2 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.6 2010/01/08 14:31:52 37.480N 121.797W 7.0 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.1 2010/01/08 13:58:48 37.477N 121.798W 6.8 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.4 2010/01/08 13:55:55 37.480N 121.790W 7.4 11 km ( 7 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
3.7 2010/01/08 11:48:50 37.482N 121.793W 9.6 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.2 2010/01/08 11:12:28 37.476N 121.792W 8.1 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.7 2010/01/08 08:05:59 37.474N 121.802W 7.9 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/08 06:07:03 37.474N 121.800W 7.6 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.2 2010/01/08 03:52:25 37.476N 121.796W 6.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.9 2010/01/08 03:29:30 37.471N 121.800W 8.0 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.8 2010/01/08 03:25:27 37.471N 121.798W 7.1 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/08 02:21:15 37.477N 121.793W 8.1 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.0 2010/01/07 23:20:25 37.469N 121.777W 5.5 11 km ( 7 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.1 2010/01/07 21:09:36 37.476N 121.798W 7.6 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.2 2010/01/07 19:53:16 37.475N 121.801W 7.9 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.2 2010/01/07 17:22:12 37.476N 121.791W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/07 16:41:56 37.476N 121.802W 8.5 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.4 2010/01/07 16:21:08 37.475N 121.802W 8.2 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.7 2010/01/07 16:00:45 37.476N 121.794W 8.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.1 2010/01/07 15:52:06 37.476N 121.804W 8.7 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/07 15:37:59 37.474N 121.801W 7.9 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/07 15:02:03 37.475N 121.793W 8.6 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/07 14:31:00 37.477N 121.794W 7.8 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/07 14:17:40 37.475N 121.795W 8.3 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/07 13:56:52 37.478N 121.793W 8.3 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/07 13:46:40 37.475N 121.797W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/07 12:34:55 37.476N 121.797W 8.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.6 2010/01/07 12:33:37 37.477N 121.795W 8.1 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.7 2010/01/07 12:21:04 37.474N 121.790W 8.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.7 2010/01/07 12:16:10 37.475N 121.794W 8.6 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.0 2010/01/07 12:09:07 37.474N 121.801W 7.9 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.8 2010/01/07 11:39:21 37.477N 121.801W 8.0 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.3 2010/01/07 11:36:38 37.478N 121.800W 8.4 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.3 2010/01/07 11:34:06 37.474N 121.800W 8.0 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/07 11:05:13 37.475N 121.794W 8.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.2 2010/01/07 10:54:42 37.476N 121.795W 8.2 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
2.2 2010/01/07 10:36:46 37.475N 121.799W 8.0 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.4 2010/01/07 10:34:48 37.478N 121.798W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/07 10:24:10 37.475N 121.803W 8.2 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/07 10:22:49 37.473N 121.800W 8.4 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.5 2010/01/07 10:19:26 37.476N 121.794W 7.9 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
4.1 2010/01/07 10:09:35 37.481N 121.799W 11.0 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
0.9 2010/01/06 04:55:45 37.476N 121.798W 8.3 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.3 2010/01/06 04:45:31 37.474N 121.798W 8.2 10 km ( 6 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
1.2 2010/01/05 20:01:19 37.462N 121.819W 7.3 7 km ( 5 mi) ENE of Milpitas, CA
posted by Gene Cowan | category Life... Don't talk to me about life.
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
comment on this entry (0 comments) | permalink | Share
